Introduction to the Book of James
		Authorship of James 
		James was a common name in New Testament times, 
			there being five mentioned in the New Testament:  
		(1) James the father of Judas (not Iscariot), one 
			of the Twelve (Luke 6:16);  
		(2) James the son of Alphaeus and his wife Mary, 
			one of the Twelve (Matthew 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13);
		 
		(3) the James mentioned in Mark 15:40, of whom 
			nothing is known;  
		(4) James, one of the Twelve, a brother of the 
			apostle John and one of the sons of Zebedee and his wife Salome. 
			(Matthew 10:2; Mark 3:17);  
		(5) James the biological brother of Jesus (Matthew 
			13:55; Mark 6:3; Galatians 1:18, 19).  
		Most scholars credit James, the brother of Jesus 
			as the author of this epistle.  It is not certain that this is 
			a fact.  However, it is in keeping with the distinction that 
			the Lord's brother had within the church to credit him as the 
			author.  The facts as we know them are that James, along with 
			the Lord's other brothers, was very slow to believe in him. John 
			wrote that "Even his brothers did not believe on him" (John 7:5).  
			However, Acts 1:14 records that His brothers were present in the 
			"upper chamber" following the crucifixion.  In 1 Corinthians 
			15:7, Paul recorded a singular appearance of Christ to James after 
			the resurrection.  No doubt, this event had a significant 
			impact to the conversion of James who went on to be a prominent 
			leader in the Lord's church (Galatians 2:9).   
		When Peter was miraculously released from prison, 
			he sent word "to James, and to the brethren" (Acts 12:17).   
			When the Jerusalem Council was held, James had one of the leading 
			parts (Acts 15:13).  The Jerusalem council, also referred to as 
			the "Apostolic Council"  was a meeting between delegates from 
			the church at Antioch (Paul, Barnabas, and others) and those from 
			the church at Jerusalem where they convened to settle a dispute 
			raised by some Jewish-Christians from Jerusalem who had come to 
			Antioch teaching that gentile converts could not be saved apart from 
			the Mosaic rite of circumcision.  In Acts 15:24-25 we learn 
			that the entire council of whom James was a prominent speaker united 
			to send out letters and chosen men with the intent of stopping the 
			influence of the Judaizers.   
		When Paul made his first visit to Jerusalem, he 
			wrote in Galatians 1:18-19, "Then after three years I went up to 
			Jerusalem to visit Cephas and remained with him fifteen days.  
			But I saw none of the other apostles except James the Lord's 
			brother".   Here James is apparently referred to as an 
			"apostle".  We know that he was not one of the original twelve.  
			In Acts 14:14 we read that Barnabas was also referred to as an apostle.  
			The Greek word literally means "one sent forth" and is also 
			translated as a "messenger".  This word has a wider reference 
			than just the 12 Apostles and Paul. In 2 Corinthians 8:23, in the 
			original Greek, two unnamed brethren are called 'apostles of the 
			churches.  In Philippians 2:25, Epaphroditus is referred to as 
			'your apostle.  It is used in 1 Thessalonians 2:6 of Paul, 
			Silas and Timothy, to define their relation to Christ.  So in 
			referring to James as an "apostle" we understand that in so doing, 
			the writer indicates that James is a prominent figure in the church.  
		 
		The Judaizing force at work in the early 
		church which sought to bring Christians back under the law of Moses, 
		(Acts 15:5) was a powerful force to contend with. They were successful 
		in bringing their influence to the churches in Galatia which prompted 
		Paul to write an Epistle to the Galatians.  The Judaizers had 
			attacked Paul's position as an Apostle and in his defense he wrote 
			of the meeting we refer to as the Jerusalem Council where he 
			presented the gospel he had been preaching to the Gentiles and was 
			given approval by the Jerusalem church.  Of significance here 
			is that Paul referred to James as a "pillar" in the church 
		(Galatians 2:9). 
		 
		While it is not certain that the author of the 
			Epistle bearing the name of James was written by the Lord's brother,  
			the content certainly points to someone who was very familiar with 
			the Lord's teachings.  Some scholars have ascribed James as a 
			commentary on Jesus' "Sermon on the Mount" because of the parallels 
			found within the two.  Two of the Twelve Apostles were named 
			James, but it is unlikely that either of these wrote the letter. One 
			apostle, James, the son of Zebedee, was martyred about 44 AD.
		This would be too early for him to have been the writer because this 
		predates the dispersion of the Jewish Christians. The 
			other apostle James, the son of Alphaeus, is not prominent in the 
			Scriptural record, and very little is known about him.  Another 
		thing to consider here is that the author of James did not identify 
		himself as one of the apostles of Christ anywhere in the letter 
		suggesting that it was not written by one.     
		 
		The prominence that James, the brother of Jesus 
			had within the church leads one to the conclusion that he is the 
			best candidate among those mentioned in scripture.  The 
			reasoning behind this is that when James penned the salutation, he 
			simply referred to himself as "James".  No other means of 
			identification was given other than his being a bond-servant of 
			Christ.  This author had to have been a well known figure 
			within the church in order to get away with such a salutation.  
			Keeping in mind the poor communication capabilities of this time 
			period in comparison with what we have today, this is a remarkably 
			brief identification.  This author wrote very authoritatively 
			and in very plain language which is indicative of his upbringing as 
			a working class man.  He expected his readership to know who he 
			was with no more introduction than just his first name and to heed 
			his instructions.  This man was obviously universally known 
			within the church and his teachings obviously carried a great deal 
			of authority.   
		So it is with confidence, that this Bible student 
			supports the general conclusions of the commentators and scholars 
			upon whom he relied in their conviction that this epistle was 
			written by James, the Lord's brother. This man was one of the 
		sons of Mary and Joseph after the birth of Jesus.  This Bible 
		student utterly rejects the doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary.  
		In Matthew 1:24-25 we learn that Joseph went ahead and accepted Mary as 
		his wife after discovering her pregnancy; "When Joseph woke from 
		sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, 
		25 but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called 
		his name Jesus."  The text supports that Joseph refrained from 
		having sexual relations with Mary until after her full term of pregnancy 
		with Jesus was finished.  Some time after His birth, they engaged 
		in normal marital relations which we learn in Mark 6:3 resulted in a 
		rather sizable family, "Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary 
		and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? And are not his 
		sisters here with us?" (ESV).  Three other verses of 
		scripture make a direct reference to the siblings of our Lord:   
		
		Matthew 12:46, "While he was still 
		speaking to the people, behold, his mother and his brothers stood 
		outside, asking to speak to him." (ESV). 
		
		Matthew 13:55-56, "Is not this the 
		carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? And are not his brothers 
		James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? And are not all his sisters with 
		us?" (ESV). 
		
		John 2:12, "After this he went down to 
		Capernaum, with his mother ands his brothers and his disciples, and they 
		stayed there for a few days." (ESV). 
		This would make James the biological half brother of 
		Jesus Christ with a plethora of scriptural evidence for support.   
		
		
		
		Fox's book of Martyrs records the death of James thus: 
		'At the age of ninety-four he was 
		beat and stoned by the Jews; and finally had his brains dashed out with 
		a fuller's club.'  A number of other uninspired early sources 
		has come up with this account reconciled and compiled by Hegesippus: 
		'The scribes and Pharisees came to James for help in putting down Christian beliefs. The record says:
They came, therefore, in a body to James, and said: "We entreat thee, restrain the people: for they are gone astray in their opinions about Jesus, as if he were the Christ. We entreat thee to persuade all who have come hither for the day of the 
		Passover, concerning Jesus. For we all listen to thy persuasion; since we, as well as all the people, bear thee testimony that thou art just, and showest partiality to none. Do thou, therefore, persuade the people not to entertain erroneous opinions concerning Jesus: for all the people, and we also, listen to thy persuasion. Take thy stand, then, upon the summit of the temple, that from that elevated spot thou mayest be clearly seen, and thy words may be plainly audible to all the people. For, in order to attend the 
		Passover, all the tribes have congregated hither, and some of the Gentiles also." 
		To the scribes' and Pharisees' dismay, James boldly testified that Christ "Himself sitteth in heaven, at the right hand of the Great Power, and shall come on the clouds of heaven." The scribes and 
		Pharisees then said to themselves, "We have not done well in procuring this testimony to Jesus. But let us go up and throw him down, that they may be afraid, and not believe him."
Accordingly, the scribes and Pharisees
...threw down the just man... [and] began to stone him: for he was not killed by the fall; but he turned, and kneeled down, and said: "I beseech Thee, Lord God our Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do."
And, while they were thus stoning him to death, one of the priests, the sons of Rechab, the son of Rechabim, to whom testimony is borne by Jeremiah the prophet, began to cry aloud, saying: "Cease, what do ye? The just man is praying for us." But one among them, one of the fullers, took the staff with which he was accustomed to wring out the garments he dyed, and hurled it at the head of the just man.
And so he suffered martyrdom; and they buried him on the spot, and the pillar erected to his memory still remains, close by the temple. This man was a true witness to both Jews and Greeks that Jesus is the Christ.' 
		The time of James' death is generally assumed to be 
		just prior to the siege of Jerusalem.  Some scholarship gives his 
		death around AD 62 while others give it as AD 69.  It is generally 
		believed that he wrote this epistle sometime close to the end of his 
		life.  This Bible student believes that James was executed by the 
		Jewish people during the reign of Nero who committed suicide in AD 68.  
		The Jews began the revolt which led to the destruction of Jerusalem in 
		AD 66.  There was a lot of Roman civil war after the death of Nero 
		which eventually settled with Vespasian as the emperor in AD 69.  
		This was a period of great unrest among both the Jewish and Roman 
		societies.  The Christians were caught up in the midst of all of 
		this and unfortunately bore considerable persecution as a result of it 
		from both sides.  It is impossible to pinpoint the exact date of 
		James' death but it should be noted that both Peter and Paul were 
		believed to have been executed by Roman authorities under the rule of 
		Nero.  Several prominent leaders of the early church met their 
		deaths during this period of history.  These events set the 
		backdrop for the purpose of the letter.  
		Purpose of the Letter 
		The letter is specifically addressed to "the twelve 
		tribes which are scattered abroad" (James 1:1).   In verse 
		two, James wastes no time at all, jumping immediately to the subject of 
		his letter which is summed up as the testing of the Christian's faith.  
		The Christians of this time period were living in constant fear of 
		persecution from both the Jews and the Romans.  Nero blamed the 
		fire of Rome on the Christians as a political move to draw the attention 
		from himself.  The Jewish leaders who rejected Christianity were 
		intent on destroying anyone professing Christ.   According to 
		Paul in Galatians 2:9, James was a prominent leader in the Jerusalem 
		church and the revolt which led to the destruction of Jerusalem was 
		either beginning or had already begun.  Keeping in mind that the 
		Christians knew that the destruction of the city was imminent and were 
		prepared to flee Jerusalem when necessary to escape the wrath of the 
		Roman army (Matthew 24).  No doubt many had left Jerusalem already, 
		choosing not to wait until the last minute, and were faced with the 
		prospect of finding a place to live elsewhere in the Roman Empire who at 
		this time was also hostile to Christianity.  This letter was 
		written
		 
		There can be no doubt they needed this 
		letter.  Peter was an elder in the Jerusalem church (1 Peter 5:1) 
		and was most likely martyred by this time.  Someone needed to stand 
		up and fill the void left in the Jerusalem church after the death of 
		Peter.  This was a dark period in the early church and staying 
		faithful to Christ was not an easy task.  James wrote this letter 
		to help encourage the readership to patiently and steadfastly endure the 
		trials of the times and to eliminate from their behavior things which 
		caused their faith to be less than what it should be. 
		 
		It has been speculated among scholars that another 
		purpose for this letter was to answer the great heresy which arose from 
		the perversion of Paul's teachings.  While the letter of James 
		directly opposed that heresy, it is not in this Bible student's opinion 
		the primary purpose for the writing of it.  James may have had this 
		mind when he wrote it and there can be no doubt he was aware of the 
		heresy when he wrote it.  Peter alluded to it in 2 Peter 3:16-17 
		and Paul even knew about and mentioned it himself in his letter to the 
		Romans in 3:6.  It is not entirely outside the realm of possibility 
		that James wrote this letter for a dual purpose.  However, this 
		student believes the primary purpose to be for the benefit of the 
		persecuted Christians of the day.   
		James wrote this letter to: 
		(1) warn Christians against falling in to 
		a host of sins commonly practiced among the Jewish people.  
		 
		
			- 
			
Formalism as contrasted with true 
			religious service (James 1:27);   
			- 
			
Unusual wrath, anger with misplaced 
			religious zeal (James 1:20);   
			- 
			
Failure to accept personal 
			responsibility for sin (James 1:13);   
			- 
			
Favoritism to the rich (James 2:2);
			  
			- 
			
Evil speaking (James 3:3-12; 4:11);
			  
			- 
			
Strife and Envy (James 3:14); 
			  
			- 
			
Boasting (James 2:5; 4:16); 
			  
			- 
			
Pride (James 4:10);  
			- 
			
Failure to act, sins of omission 
			(James 4:17);  
			- 
			
Oppression (James 5:4);  
			- 
			
Swearing of Oaths (James 5:12).  
		 
		(2) To teach Christians to persevere with 
		patience: 
		
			- 
			
In trials (James 1:2),   
			- 
			
In good works (James 1:22-25), 
			  
			- 
			
Under provocation (James 3:17),
			  
			- 
			
Under oppression (James 5:7), 
			  
			- 
			
Under persecution (James 5:10).
			  
			- 
			
In assisting one another when they 
			fall into error (James 5:19).  
		 
		(3) The promise and 
		expectation of patience and perseverance is: 
		
			- 
			
A living Faith completed 
			by obedience (James 2:20-22);  
			- 
			
Justification (James 
			2:21);  
			- 
			
Righteousness (James 2:23; 
			3:18);  
			- 
			
Salvation (James 4:12);  
			- 
			
The Lord's swift coming to 
			right all wrong (James 5:8).  
		 
		Application of the Letter Today 
		Paul's teachings were perverted in the first century 
		and they are perverted today.  Despite the warnings found in 
		scripture, countless millions of people professing Christ erroneously 
		use Paul's teachings to promote the doctrine of salvation by faith 
		alone.  This doctrine is held by the vast majority of those 
		claiming Christ as savior today and is the result of selective use of 
		Paul's teachings and an utter misapplication or downright dismissal of 
		what the author of this epistle wrote.  This letter by James has 
		been called the gospel of common sense and well it is.  It is 
		written by a man who grew up as a carpenter and knew how to communicate 
		in simple and easy to understand terms.  His message is clear, 
		concise, to the point and very easily understood unless someone 
		approaches it with a preconceived belief structure.   
		James wrote that Christians have an obligation to work 
		in service to Christ.  There are duties expected and standards to 
		live by which are essential if one is to live acceptably and receive a 
		home in heaven with God.  Martin Luther rejected James' epistle on 
		the grounds that it was hopelessly contradictory to the teachings of 
		Paul.  He denied it was the work of an apostle and termed it an 
		"epistle of straw" as compared to some other books in the New Testament 
		because of the conflict he thought it raised with Paul on the doctrine 
		of justification.  What Luther and the vast majority of people 
		today fail to take into consideration is that James does not conflict 
		with Paul's corpus of teaching.  The doctrine of salvation by faith 
		alone can only be supported with a selective use of scripture, most of 
		it coming from the pen of Paul.  However, when all of New Testament 
		is considered in light of the redemption of man, it is plainly evident 
		that salvation cannot be by faith alone.  The book of James goes so 
		far as to make the inspired statement that salvation is not by faith 
		alone in James 2:24, "You 
		see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone" 
		(ESV).  Anyone who is at all concerned 
		for their salvation and either believes or teaches that salvation is by 
		faith alone cannot approach this book of the New Testament and not 
		seriously question this belief.   
		Martin Luther was well aware of the contradiction 
		James had with his idea of Paul's justification by faith alone.  
		Luther was quoted as saying:  
		"Faith justifies.., faith does not justify." I will pledge my life that 
		no one can reconcile those propositions; and if he succeeds, he may call 
		me a fool?"  So Luther's approach to this was to take verses such 
		as Romans 5:1, 
		Galatians 2:16 and others, and build his doctrine around 
		these verses without taking into consideration what Paul taught 
		elsewhere on these same subjects.  It cannot be overstressed that 
		Paul did not teach two different gospels, neither did he contradict 
		himself in his body of writings.  If this were the case, the entire 
		case for the divine inspiration of scripture would crumble and none of 
		the New Testament could be authoritative for us today.  So with 
		this said, we'll examine some comparisons between James and the 
		teachings of Paul concerning works.   
		  
		James taught that people are justified by 
		works (James 2:24) and not by "faith only"; and Paul taught 
		exactly the same thing. "The righteous judgment of God; who will 
		render to every man according to his works" (Romans 2:6). "Wrath 
		and indignation to every man that worketh evil.., glory, honor and peace 
		to every man that worketh good" (Romans 2:8,9);  "..eternal life to those who by 
		patient continuance in doing good seek for glory, honor, and 
		immortality; 8 but to those who are self-seeking and do not obey the 
		truth, but obey unrighteousness — indignation and wrath, 9 tribulation 
		and anguish, on every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and 
		also of the Greek; 10 but glory, honor, and peace to everyone who works 
		what is good." (Romans 2:7-10) (NKJV). 
		
		James required of Christians that they be 
		"doers of the law" (James 4:11); but Paul also said categorically that "Not 
		the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law 
		shall be justified" (Romans 2:13). When Paul spoke of faith, he 
		always referred to an obedient faith, as in Romans 1:5; 16:26. 
		 
		James taught his readership in James 2:21-23, "Was 
		not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son 
		Isaac on the altar? 
		 You 
		see that
		faith was active along with his 
		works, and faith was completed
		by his works"  Paul 
		taught the Christians in Philippi in Philippians 2:12-13, "Therefore, 
		my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my 
		presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with 
		fear and trembling" (ESV). 
		
		
		
		James wrote: "If ye fulfill the royal 
		law, according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" 
		(James 2:8). Paul commanded: "Bear ye one another's burdens, and so 
		fulfill the law of Christ" (Galatians 6:2). The "law" 
		mentioned by James is the "law of Christ," since Christ is the only 
		divine "lawgiver" (James 4:12), who was ever King, the royal law mentioned by James can 
		be none other than the law of Christ.   
		
		James required that the Christian should 
		"keep himself unspotted from the world" (James 1:27); and Paul 
		required the same thing: "And be not fashioned according to this 
		world" (Romans 12:2).  
		Martin Luther claimed to be unable to 
		reconcile the teachings of Paul and the teachings of James regarding 
		works.  And if one approaches the scriptures with the preconceived 
		notion that all works of righteousness are unnecessary then it is indeed 
		impossible to reconcile the two.  And significant to this 
		discussion, if works of righteousness are unnecessary then Paul's 
		teachings cannot even be reconciled with themselves.  Any attempt 
		to reconcile the doctrine of salvation by faith alone with all of 
		scripture results in denying the essentiality of obedience to the will 
		of God.  Either one must be obedient to God or not, and scripture is 
		saturated with verses which affirm the essentiality of obedience.  
		It is not possible to obey God in any way without engaging in some kind 
		of work.   Even simple belief is a mental exercise acted upon 
		as the result of a choice and is scripturally identified as a work in 
		and of itself in John 6:29, "Jesus answered them, "This is the work 
		of God that you believe in him whom he has sent." (ESV).  
		Therefore if works are categorically unnecessary, it would be unnecessary to believe 
		or repent of our former lifestyles.  Luke quoted Jesus in 13:3 and again in V5 as saying, "...unless 
		your repent, you will all likewise perish" (ESV).  If faith 
		alone were all that was necessary, then there will be people in heaven 
		who did not repent and Jesus said they would "all likewise perish".  
		 
		Jesus was quoted by Matthew in 7:11 as 
		saying, "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the 
		kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in 
		heaven" (ESV).  If salvation is by faith alone, then there will 
		be people in the kingdom of heaven who were disobedient to the will of 
		God.   
		Paul declared that men are justified by 
		faith, and James wrote that men are justified by works. In simple truth, 
		they are justified by both, the absence of either being a forfeiture of 
		any hope of justification.  Luther misunderstood both Paul and 
		James, because Paul did not say that "faith alone justifies"; nor did 
		James say that "faith does not justify," but that "faith alone cannot 
		justify." It is in the perversity of that little word "alone" or "only" 
		wherein all the difficulty lies. 
		Paul declared that men are justified by 
		faith, and James wrote that men are justified by works.  So how do 
		we harmonize the two so that we have the proper understanding with no 
		contradictions?   
		
			- Grace:  We are saved by grace in 
			that man did nothing to merit or earn God's favor.  God looked 
			down on lost mankind and out of His loving nature, He graciously 
			provided mankind with a way out of sin and back into fellowship with 
			Himself.  There is nothing mankind did or could do to earn, 
			merit or deserve such a wonderful opportunity.  Grace is not 
			unconditional or else everyone would be saved regardless of 
			religious affiliation.  The condition for grace:
 
			- Faith:  Ephesians 2:8, "For
			by grace you have been saved
			through faith."   
			Faith is the condition for grace.  
 
			- Working for Grace:  We cannot 
			earn, merit or deserve the gift of God's grace: Ephesians 2:8-9, "And 
			this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of 
			works, so that no one may boast."   It is exceedingly 
			important to keep in mind that Paul is talking about grace.  
			Mankind cannot do anything to earn, deserve or obtain God's grace on 
			his own.  The opportunity and method for man to be reconciled 
			to God cannot be achieved by the works of man in any way.  It 
			is 100% available only through the working of God.  Mankind had 
			nothing to do with the deliverance of God's grace.
 
			- Works of Man:  Mankind cannot 
			devise a system of works whereby he can be justified.  The only 
			way mankind could do that would be for him to make it unnecessary 
			for Christ to have died on the cross.  The opportunity for 
			man's salvation came at an enormous personal sacrifice by God.  
			That sacrifice can not be repaid by the works of man.  Man can 
			never make it to God without the sacrifice of Christ on the cross.
			
 
			- Works of Faith:   Works of 
			faith are those things that man must do in obedience to God's will.  
			Man must obey the command to believe, (John 6:29).  Obeying the 
			command to believe does not repay God for the personal sacrifice He 
			made to redeem mankind.  God does not owe mankind anything 
			because they obeyed Him.  Man must repent, (Luke 13:3, 5).  
			Obeying the command to turn from one's former sinful life does not 
			earn one a spot in heaven.  God does not owe man salvation 
			because he obeyed God's command to repent.  This principle 
			applies to every command Jesus gave, either directly or through His 
			inspired teachers.  In this regard, works cannot save because 
			no amount of them can repay God for the tremendous personal cost 
			incurred when salvation was made possible.  
 
		 
		But the inability for works of faith to 
		repay the cost does not excuse mankind from the obligation to obey God.  
		Works of faith can never earn anyone a spot in heaven but that does not 
		mean mankind is free to live as he sees fit.  James and Paul were 
		talking about two different sides of the same issue.  One one hand, 
		Paul is explaining that works cannot earn or merit one's salvation.  
		James is explaining that works are required for salvation.  We 
		understand this to be works in obedience to God and not works contrived 
		by mankind.  So to harmonize the two concepts, works of faith are 
		required, but we must understand that these works, while necessary, can 
		never repay what it cost God to offer us salvation. In the end, no 
		matter what good we may do on this earth, we are still going to fall 
		short of repaying God what it cost Him to offer us redemption which was 
		centered on the life of His Son.  And we need to 
		understand that and know that this is why Paul teaches in Ephesians 2 that 
		grace is a gift that cannot be earned by man's works and then turns 
		around and tells the Philippian Christians in 2:12 to work out their own 
		salvation with fear and trembling.   
		Many of the commentators who have written 
		on this book have made the claim that this letter is practical and not 
		doctrinal.  This is a veiled attempt to do away with this letter as 
		a document with salvational requirements.   This letter is all 
		about obedience to God, which is a requirement for salvation and is 
		saturated throughout the New Testament.  Jesus said Himself in 
		Matthew 7:21 that only those who do the will of the Father in Heaven 
		will "enter the kingdom of Heaven" (KJV).  So when James wrote that by "works a man is 
		justified, and not by faith only" (James 2:24), he was simply 
		reinforcing what Jesus said in Matthew 7:21.  That is a matter of 
		salvation and therefore as doctrinal as it gets. 
		 
		In summary, the primary application for the 
		epistle of James is that it teaches us that faith in God is meant to be 
		active, loving and obedient.  The other writers of scripture affirm 
		the same thing, but James devoted an entire letter to this theme thus 
		making this one of the most important books of the New Testament as far 
		as Christian living is concerned.   If one wants to know how a 
		Christian is expected live, one can turn to almost any verse in this marvelous 
		letter and learn.   
		  
		
		  
		
		The Book 
		of James  
		
		Introduction by Matt Mazzalongo of
		
		BibleTalk.tv 
		
		Faith and 
		Practical Christianity.  
		
		If you 
		were to ask people to define or to explain the word religion they would 
		probably describe the organizations and the ceremonies carried out by 
		various Church groups. 
		
		This 
		could probably be why younger people say that they are spiritual, but 
		they're not religious.  They don't relate as easily to organized 
		religion as people born several years earlier.  And the reason for this 
		is that they no longer relate to the various rituals and observances 
		practiced by the large denominations in this country. So when you 
		mention religion to a younger person, they think of a big building, big 
		organization.   They have guessed that Christianity is more than just 
		candles or processions or rituals and complex church hierarchies that 
		dominate the Christian religion of our day. 
		
		When 
		you watch the news and they have a story about religion, it's about the 
		pope or it's about the Archbishop, or they show the big long procession 
		during Easter or at Christmas.  All you see is the crowds, the 
		ceremonies, the candles. That's what they show. And younger people are 
		saying, I believe in God, and I think I'm a spiritual person, but I 
		don't relate to that stuff.  
		
		
		Unfortunately, most people do not realize that Biblical Christianity 
		really has only two observances that involve some type of ceremony or 
		ritual.  The first, of course, is Baptism where a repentant 
		believer in Jesus Christ is immersed in water and at that moment by 
		faith, receives forgiveness of sin.  The second ceremony is 
		communion where the church comes together on the Lord's day to share the 
		bread and the fruit of the vine in order to commemorate the death of 
		Jesus and to witness their faith and their hope in His resurrection and 
		in His return. (Acts 20:7) 
		
		These are 
		the only two ceremonies given by God in the Bible for Christians to 
		perform and both of them have to do with personal salvation. In baptism 
		we experience salvation.  In communion we remember salvation. That's it. 
		All the rest of it - all the parades, and all the smoke, and all the 
		candles, and all the images, and all the stuff has been invented by 
		human beings.  Those are all add-ons that don't have any real authority 
		in the scriptures. 
		
		So all 
		other ceremonies and traditions have been added by men and without any 
		authorization from God. Now the problem with these man-made ceremonies 
		and traditions is when they become compulsory. I mean, is it ok if 
		somebody celebrates Christmas, or if somebody decides to fast on 
		Tuesdays, is this wrong? No.  The problem is when we make that 
		compulsory for everybody else.  It is set up as a religious law and 
		everybody else has got to do it.  The result of all of this 
		man-made activity is that Christianity has become, for many people, a 
		series of festivals, Easter, Christmas and others. 
		
		
		Christianity, for many, has become simply a series of personalities. The 
		pope, cardinals, TV evangelists and other individuals, who have some 
		sort of "high position" in some church organization. Groups who have 
		their own distinctive ceremonies and language.  It comes down to 
		religious branding. Certain churches have specific means of 
		identification, they put up the same sign in front of their buildings in 
		order to identify themselves and separate themselves from other groups.  
		 
		
		Now, 
		you're wondering, what does this have to do with James? Well, what it 
		has to do with James is this 
		
		
		Christianity is more than just ceremonies.  It's more than just a 
		religious leader who has some sort of great following.  It's more than 
		just a building.  Christianity is a way of life. That's going to be 
		James's primary focus in this letter.   
		
		
		Christianity is a way of life. For example, every farmer, regardless of 
		the country or time has a similar lifestyle. It doesn't matter if you're 
		farming in Nebraska or if you're farming in Texas or in Russia. 
		
		Farmers 
		get up early in the morning. Farmers don't sleep in, no matter who or 
		where they are.  They work outside, not inside. They deal with the 
		weather.  Farmers all have a similar lifestyle that characterizes them.  
		They all have a similar lifestyle. Well, in the same way, Christianity 
		is a certain lifestyle. 
		
		
		Regardless of the time or place.  Christianity has been made to be 
		buildings and people and branding and this type of thing, and the 
		general public has lost the idea that Christianity is a way of life.  
		It's a way of life defined by what the Bible teaches.  It's a way of 
		life that is very different from others who are not Christians. 
		
		The 
		purpose of this study is to learn about the Christian way of life as 
		James explains it in his book and how to adapt to it. The book of James 
		an extremely practical guide to living the Christian life in a way that 
		pleases God.  Living in a way that maintains order and peace in the 
		church and provides a clear Christian witness to those outside the 
		church.  The goal of James's book is not to preach the gospel or to 
		prove Jesus as the son of God.  He wants to teach the people he's 
		writing to, how to live the Christian life.  It's not the same life 
		as you had before you became a Christian.  One who comes to the 
		knowledge of the truth and responds to it must change their life 
		accordingly.   
		
		When 
		studying this epistle, there's always the question of authorship. Which 
		James wrote this letter? There are four James' mentioned in the New 
		Testament. 
		
		The first 
		James, the brother of John, in Matthew 41, it says, “Going on from 
		there, he saw two other brothers, James the son of Zebedee and John his 
		brother in the boat with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and 
		he called to them”   
		
		Herod had 
		James, the brother of John put to death with a sword."  James, the 
		brother of John could not have written this book because he before this 
		letter was written.  We believe this letter was written somewhere 
		between 4 and 6 AD. And James, the brother of John, was put to death 
		much earlier than that. So that rules him out. 
		
		Another 
		James, James the son of Alphaeus, the apostle. Matthew 13, it says, 
		"Philip and Bartholomew, Thomas and Matthew, the tax collector, James, 
		the son of Alphas, and Thaddeus. This James was referred to as James the 
		less. He was likely Jesus's cousin.  There's no other mention of him in 
		historical records.  That rules him out as the author because the 
		author of James was well known in the early church .  We don't know 
		anything about this particular James.  So that rules him out as well. 
		
		James 
		number 3, James the father of Judas. He's also an individual who is 
		mentioned here.  But he's not mentioned anywhere else, other than 
		in one passage in the New Testament.  So that kind of rules him 
		out. There's three of the four James' that have been mentioned. 
		
		The 
		fourth James, James the earthly brother of Jesus, Matthew 13:55 says, "Is 
		not this the carpenter's son?" People were questioning, Jesus.  “Is 
		not His mother called Mary, and his brothers James and Joseph and Simon 
		and Judas."  So this James who introduced himself only as James 
		demonstrates he assumes that everyone knows who he is. James, the 
		brother of Jesus had that kind of reputation in the first century. 
		
		James 
		doesn't claim that he's an apostle of Jesus.  We know from other 
		passages that the Lord's brother became a leader of the church in 
		Jerusalem, and thus had the authority to write such a letter. 
		
		In Acts 
		15:12 in regards to the Jerusalem council it says, "All the people 
		kept silent and they were listening to Barnabas and Paul, as they were 
		relating what signs and wonders God had done through them among the 
		gentiles." 
		
		So they 
		were reporting their mission trip to the church in Jerusalem. Then it 
		says, "After they had stopped speaking, James answered, saying, 
		"Brethren, listen to me."  One 
		must 
		have some status in the church if your audience is Paul and Barnabas and 
		the other apostles and the elders, and you stand up and you say 
		brethren, listen to me and they listen.  And so, this James had 
		authority. He had position in the church in Jerusalem.  He went on to 
		help craft a letter about Gentiles being eligible to be Christians 
		without being circumcised. When you read his letter you can see that he 
		does not waste words at all.   It’s short and to the point.  
		 
		
		Acts 
		15:23-29, “and they sent this letter by them, 
		
		"The 
		apostles and the brethren who are elders, to the brethren in Antioch and 
		Syria and Cilicia who are from the Gentiles, greetings. 
		 
		
		24 "Since 
		we have heard that some of our number to whom we gave no instruction 
		have disturbed you with their words, unsettling your souls, 25 it seemed 
		good to us, having become of one mind, to select men to send to you with 
		our beloved Barnabas and Paul, 26 men who have risked their lives for 
		the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.  
		
		27 
		"Therefore we have sent Judas and Silas, who themselves will also report 
		the same things by word of mouth.  
		
		28 "For 
		it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater 
		burden than these essentials: 29 that you abstain from things sacrificed 
		to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication; 
		if you keep yourselves free from such things, you will do well. Farewell."
		 
		
		The 
		brevity of this letter resembles the writing style of the book authored 
		by James.  It is the general consensus that James, the earthly brother 
		of the Lord, one of the early leaders in the church at Jerusalem, was 
		the one that wrote the epistle of James.  
		
		  
		
		The 
		Lord's brother didn't believe in Him before His death and resurrection 
		In John 7 it says, "Therefore, His brother said to him, 'Leave here 
		and go into Judea, so that your disciples also may see your works, which 
		you were doing. For no one does anything in secret when he, himself, 
		seeks to be known publicly. If you do these things, show yourself to the 
		world, for not even his brothers were believing in him.” 
		
		We know 
		that this James was married.  In 1 Corinthians 9:5-6, we read, “Do we 
		not have a right to take along a believing wife, even as the rest of the 
		apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?” 
		
		He was 
		married. He and the rest of the family thought that Jesus was actually 
		unbalanced, and they tried to bring Him home.  
		
		Mark 
		30-22 
		
		 And 
		He came home, and the crowd gathered again, to such an extent that they 
		could not even eat a meal. 21 When His own people heard of this, they 
		went out to take custody of Him; for they were saying, "He has lost His 
		senses." 22 The scribes who came down from Jerusalem were saying, "He is 
		possessed by Beelzebul," and "He casts out the demons by the ruler of 
		the demons." 
		
		The word 
		that they use – “take custody of Him.”  They went out to 
		bring Him home by force if necessary.   
		
		We know 
		that James was in the company of the apostles in the upper room after 
		Jesus's appearance to him. 
		
		Acts 
		1:13-14 
		
		 When 
		they had entered the city, they went up to the upper room where they 
		were staying; that is, Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and 
		Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon 
		the Zealot, and Judas the son of James. 14 These all with one mind were 
		continually devoting themselves to prayer, along with the women, and 
		Mary the mother of Jesus, and with His brothers.  
		
		Another 
		writer, Josephus, was a Jewish Historian. He was not a Christian, but he 
		lived at the time of Jesus and as a historian, recorded much of the 
		history of that era.  Josephus mentions James in one of his history 
		books. James was killed in 62 AD by the Jews. They threw him off the 
		wall but it did not kill him.  They went down to the rocks and they 
		stoned him. He still wasn't dead so they clubbed him to death. James had 
		a difficult death as a martyr to his brother.    
		
		In his 
		introductory verse, James refers to himself as a bond-servant, or a 
		lowly slave, of Jesus. Thus demonstrating, not only his love and his 
		piety, but he also shows his humility. At first he didn't believe in 
		Jesus.  He mocked Him. He thought he was crazy. But then, he became a 
		believer.   And that to this student of God’s word is evidence of the 
		authenticity of Christianity.   
		
		No one 
		knows you like your siblings.  If Jesus was not who he claimed to be, 
		there is no way on earth a sibling could ever be convinced of it 
		otherwise.   Bear in mind that Jesus claimed to be God, He had to have 
		lived a sinless life growing up around his family.  Sinlessness was a 
		qualification that Jesus had to possess in order to be capable of 
		bringing about the forgiveness of sin He offered on the cross.   James’ 
		ultimate decision to believe in and die for that belief in his brother 
		had to have been based in part on his observations of Jesus; character 
		growing up.   If Jesus were not who He claimed to be, who better would 
		know it than a sibling that grew up with Him?   
		
		  
		  
		
		
		A brief outline of the Book of James.   
		
		  
		
		
		Theme: Faith and Practical Christianity
		
		“My brothers, whenever you 
		face trials of any kind, consider it nothing but joy, because you know 
		that the testing of your faith produces endurance” (1:2-3). 
		At first reading, we would probably think that James is going to spend 
		this letter talking about trials. But as we read the letter we see that 
		James is going to talk about faith. James is going to talk about the 
		character of faith and the purpose of faith in our lives. The first half 
		of chapter 1 is about the testing of faith. 
		
		  
		
		
		The Testing of Faith (1:2-18)
		
		The purpose of tests 
		(2-12). James 
		begins his letter by teaching the Jewish Christians that our faith must 
		be tested so we can become mature, complete, and lacking nothing. There 
		is no doubt that these Christians were experiencing a testing of their 
		faith as they had to leave their homes in Jerusalem due to a severe 
		persecution brought about through the Sanhedrin. During trials, James 
		say we need to “ask 
		in faith” for 
		wisdom. If we do not ask in full belief that God will answer, then we 
		ought not to expect anything from the Lord (vs. 7). 
		
		  
		
		The source of temptations 
		(13-18). For 
		some reason, human nature seems to want to blame God for our problems. 
		In the middle of these trials and temptations, do not blame God. Rather, 
		God is the giver of every good and perfect gift. Since our faith must be 
		tested to make us mature, complete, and lacking nothing, James is going 
		to describe for us what mature, perfected faith looks like. 
		
		
		The Character of Faith (1:19-5:6)
		
		
		 
		
		Faith obeys God’s law 
		(1:19-27). James 
		will spend a lot of time in this letter discussing how faith is an 
		obedient faith. James begins pointing out that obedience is a critical 
		component of faith. Obedience requires us to be quick to hear, slow to 
		speak, and slow to anger. We have to put away all filthiness and 
		wickedness. Instead we have to receive with meekness the word of God. 
		Therefore, we must be quick to listen to the word of God and be doers of 
		the word. The purpose of listening to the word of God is so that you and 
		I can do something about it. We do not look in the mirror and then walk 
		away without making changes to our appearance. Yet how often to see look 
		into the mirror of the word of God, but then walk away without making 
		any personal changes. 
		
		  
		
		Faith does not show 
		favoritism (2:1-13). “My 
		brothers, hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ without 
		showing favoritism” (2:1). 
		Mature faith does not make judgments based upon outward appearances. 
		James warns about paying attention to people who would come into the 
		assembly with fine clothes, but treating differently people who come in 
		dressed poorly. We can never set aside God’s law to love our neighbor as 
		ourselves. We do not get to apply this command when we feel like it. If 
		we ignore one part of God’s law, then we are guilty of all of the law. 
		
		  
		
		Faith requires works 
		(2:14-26). As 
		we have already noted, this point continues to be the repeated theme of 
		the letter. The person does not look into the law of liberty and do 
		nothing. He must act upon the knowledge of the word of God. Faith leads 
		to obedience, putting away all wickedness. Now James says that faith 
		without works is dead and useless. Faith without action is not faith at 
		all. 
		
		  
		
		Faith controls the tongue 
		(3:1-12). In 
		chapter three, we still see that James is talking about faith that leads 
		to a mature person. A mature person is able to control his whole body 
		(3:2). James warns that we must control our tongues. The tongue can be 
		used for healing or for hurting. “So 
		also the tongue is a small part of the body, and yet it boasts of great 
		things. See how great a forest is set aflame by such a small fire! And 
		the tongue is a fire, the very world of iniquity” (James 
		3:5-6). As verses 10-11 point out, it is not possible to have a clean 
		heart but a wicked tongue. The tongue reflects what is in our hearts. 
		
		  
		
		Faith produces wisdom 
		(3:13-18). James 
		continues to press the teaching of active faith. “Who 
		is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show 
		his works in the meekness of wisdom” (3:13). 
		Wicked must be put aside. This time, James declares our need to remove 
		bitter jealousy and selfish ambition from our hearts. Our faith is shown 
		through good conduct. I believe James said that we show our faith in God 
		through wise living. 
		
		  
		
		Faith produces humility 
		(4:1-12). “God 
		resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble” 
		(4:6). Notice that right after James quotes Solomon’s proverb, he makes 
		this application: “Therefore, submit to God.” James 
		continues to stress the point that faith will obey what God has 
		commanded. True faith will humble ourselves before God and let God gives 
		us the honor. 
		
		  
		
		Faith depends upon God 
		alone (4:13-5:6). In 
		verses 13-17 of chapter 4 we see that true faith will depend upon God on 
		a daily basis. All plans are made through God. Wealth is probably one of 
		the best ways to evaluate our faith in God. I think verse 5 of chapter 5 
		could be speaking of all of us: “You 
		have lived luxuriously on the land and have indulged yourselves. You 
		have fattened your hearts for the day of slaughter.” The 
		way we handle our wealth reveals how strong our faith is in God. Many 
		times we only trust in God when we are doing well financially. As soon 
		as something changes, through loss of money or loss of work, we can 
		panic and make decisions that do not reflect a faith that depends upon 
		God alone. We have to trust God through the difficult financial times, 
		not throw away our faith because we think our family will not be 
		provided for. 
		
		  
		
		Faith patiently awaits the 
		coming of the Lord (5:7-12). I 
		think a point of clarification should be made immediately. It does not 
		appear that James is talking about the final coming of the Lord. Two 
		verses indicate this: “Strengthen 
		your hearts, because the Lord’s coming is near” (5:8). Also, “Look, the 
		judge stands at the door!” (5:9). 
		Both of these verses speaking to the immediacy of the coming of the 
		Lord. If James was speaking about the second coming, then James was 
		wrong about when the Lord would come. This is not an acceptable 
		conclusion. The coming of the Lord must refer to something else. Verses 
		9-11 are talking about examples of suffering and patience. These Jewish 
		Christians had been suffering from the persecution by the Jews of 
		Jerusalem. Therefore, the coming of the Lord must refer to the judgment 
		that was going to take place against the Jews of Jerusalem for killing 
		the saints. Christians have a faith that patiently awaits judgment upon 
		those who cause us pain and suffering. 
		
		  
		
		Faith knows the power of 
		prayer (5:13-18). James 
		discusses the power of prayer to save the sick. Elijah is used as an 
		example of the effective power of prayer. Proof of the power of prayer 
		is found in what Elijah was able to ask God to do. I think our problem 
		returns to the fact that we do not believe God will do anything we ask. 
		This problem ties back into the beginning of the letter where James said 
		that those who do not ask in faith should not expect to receive anything 
		from the Lord. We need to realize the power of prayer have the faith in 
		God to answer. 
		
		  
		
		Faith brings back the 
		erring (5:19-20). True 
		faith cares about the souls of others that they will help those who are 
		spiritually sick. We should be zealous to help those who are weak in the 
		faith. We help them with cards, letters, and visitation. We help the 
		weak by being here for worship. Many of us do not have time to meet 
		together on a daily basis. We need to meet together at every opportunity 
		so we can strengthen the weak. Those who have fallen away needs us to 
		come and try to help them come back. 
		
		The 
		letter of James concludes without any closing or greeting, which is 
		unusual. 
		
		
		Conclusion:
		
		Trials show the value of 
		our faith. Difficult 
		times reveal the strength of our faith in God. Trials produce the 
		character that God wants us to have. While painful, we need to view a 
		trial as our opportunity to purify our faith and reveal our trust in 
		God. 
		
		Real faith submits and 
		obeys God. Verbal 
		faith is useless and dead. God is looking for us to have a trust in God 
		that will act upon our belief in God. If we are unwilling to be obedient 
		to God’s laws, then we do not have faith and are lost. 
		
		  
		
		Real faith will change our 
		character. We 
		will not show partiality toward others based upon external judgments. We 
		will control our tongues and exercise humility. We will believe in the 
		power of prayer and rely upon the Lord to act on our behalf. 
		   |